Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Brigas no Backstage de The Walking Dead!!!


Nos bastidores da série, o bicho tá pegando.Um dos atores (homem ou mulher) do elenco principal está prestar a deixar o elenco!
A confusão aconteceu depois que um dos criadores do programa e produtor-executivo, o Frank Darabont, foi demitido depois da 1º temporada pelo AMC Channel, que produz o seriado. A tal estrela de “The Walking Dead” não gostou do escândalo, tomou as dores do Frank e pediu para sair da série.
A partir daí, o roteiro da segunda temporada foi escrito de maneira que ele seja cortado da história. O contrato com o seriado que ele/ela assinou também diz que o tempo acabou.
No entanto, o ator/atriz passou um tempo no seriado, passou a raivinha e agora mudou de ideia. Mas já seria tarde demais. Um ator importante do elenco será eliminado. E agora?
Qual deles poderia ser? Já tem gente apostando forte no ator Jon Berthal, que interpreta o mocinho/antagonista Shane. Quando Darabont foi demitido, ele soltou os cachorros para os quatro cantos do mundo.
Pram quem não conhece o ator,dê uma olhadinha na foto abaixo

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

2 Years Working For The Mall And..... You're Fired

Hoje completei 2 anos de trabalho no Shopping xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
Pois bem,como em um dia típico de trabalho,me arrumei e saí de casa ás 18:40 (Horário de Brasília,e horário de verão,lol) e fui trabalhar.

Tudo bem que eu já queria isso,e querendo ou não,eu consegui,lol.
Fui mandado embora sem ser por justa causa,Graças Á Deus!
Bom,agora vem a melhor notícia...
Vou pegar meu dinheiro,incluindo o seguro desemprego e me mudar para a ARGENTINA com a minha Mãe,WOOHOOOOO
Vamos fazer de tudo para este plano dar certo
Deus tem planos para todos nós,e tenho certeza que um ótimo futuro nos aguarda.


Friday, October 14, 2011

Senator Leahy announces mark-up on Respect for Marriage Act


Big news out of DC today: Senator Patrick Leahy just announced that there will be a mark-up on the Respect for Marriage Act (H.R. 1116, S. 598), the bill that would repeal the so-called Defense of Marriage Act, next month. This is a huge step forward for ending federal marriage discrimination, and we applaud Senator Leahy for his leadership. Here's what the Senator had to say this morning as he made the announcement:
“The march for equality continues, and now is the time to ensure equality for gay and lesbian Americans who are lawfully married. Next month, I will call up the Respect for Marriage Act for debate and a vote in the Judiciary Committee.  The Respect for Marriage Act would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, which prevents thousands of American families from being protected by laws that help secure other American families.  This is part of the nation’s continuing fight for civil rights for all Americans.”
This year, we've played a leading role in growing the number of cosponsorsin the House and Senate- since its introduction, cosponsors on the Senate version have grown from 18 to 29 and on the House version, from 108 to 128, which already surpasses last year’s total of 120. 
In July, Evan testified at the US Senate Judiciary Committee’s first-ever hearing on repealing DOMA, calling on Congress to put an end to the discriminatory law and return the federal government to its appropriate role of respecting marriages performed in the states.  In addition, Ron Wallen testified about the harm DOMA has inflicted on him after the death of his spouse. Wallen married his partner of 58 years, Tom Carrollo, in California before the freedom to marry was stripped away by Proposition 8. Carrollo died in March 2011. Because DOMA denies him access to the Social Security Survivor benefit, Wallen can no longer afford to live in the home he shared with his husband and, as a result, he is rushing to sell the home. 



Sunday, October 9, 2011

Gay couples, advocates fight for recognition


WASHINGTON — Now that the U.S. military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy is history, gay rights advocates and their supporters in Congress and the Obama administration are shifting their focus to repealing state and federal laws that define marriage as between one man and one woman.


While six states and the District of Columbia allow same-sex marriage and several other states provide varying degrees of legal recognition to same-sex couples, including civil unions and domestic partnerships, the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act prevents the federal government from recognizing legal same-sex marriages from any state.
Rep. David Price, D-N.C., a leading co-sponsor of repeal legislation, said the law “will look more and more anachronistic as more states adopt gay marriage.”
President Barak Obama , while stopping short of a full endorsement of same-sex marriage, told one of the nation’s leading gay rights organizations last week that he would work to repeal the law. Earlier this year, his Justice Department said it would stop defending it in court.
“I believe the law runs counter to the Constitution, and it’s time for it to end once and for all,” Obama said at the Human Rights Campaign’s annual dinner Saturday in Washington. “It should join ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ in the history books.”
The U.S. Census Bureau announced last week that it had counted 646,000 same-sex couples across the country in 2010. Though one in five of these couples identified themselves as married, many live in states that offer limited or no legal recognition of their partnerships. That complicates many routine matters for gay couples, from child custody to inheritance to immigration.
“The vast majority of gay people identifying themselves as married actually are married or are in a legal relationship,” said Evan Wolfson, the founder of Freedom To Marry, a New York-based gay rights organization. “They’re doing the best they can under the imperfect law to get legal respect for their committed relationships.”
Federal law permits states to define marriage any way they choose, and 37 of the 50 states have defined marriage as between one man and one woman.
Same-sex marriage opponents would like to keep it that way.
In 2008, they successfully overturned court-ordered same-sex marriage in California by taking the issue to voters; Proposition 8 passed with 52 percent of the vote. Last year, a federal district judge struck down the voter-approved law in an ongoing case that likely will end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.
“We’re supposed to have a representative form of government where voters ultimately make these decisions, not one where judges make social judgment calls,” said Andy Pugno, the general counsel for the Proposition 8 Defense Fund and Protect Marriage Coalition, who said he thinks the Supreme Court will uphold the law.
Same-sex marriage opponents point out that they’ve won in every state where the issue has been put on the ballot. But polls show that could be changing. In North Carolina, where voters will consider a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage next spring, an Elon University poll shows that 56 percent oppose the ban, while 39 percent support it.
Leaders in Washington are changing their minds, too. Last month, Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida became the first Republican to back the repeal of the federal Defense of Marriage Act. Though she voted for the law in 1996, a decade later she declined to support a federal constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage.
Rep. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., an openly gay member of Congress who’s running for the U.S. Senate, said while she hoped that Ros-Lehtinen’s support would encourage other Republicans to back the repeal of an “unjust” law, last year’s midterm elections dealt a “significant setback” to that effort.
The repeal bill has 125 co-sponsors in the Republican-majority House of Representatives and 29 in the Democratic-led Senate.
“It’s a steep hill to climb. That’s not to say we won’t climb it,” Price said. “Repeal is going to be a tough political fight.”
Baldwin said her main focus wasn’t on gay issues, but the economy. “This is a tough time for our country,” she said. “My constituents don’t care that I’m gay.”
In the meantime, gay and lesbian couples still face a patchwork of state laws.
Roughly 50,000 same-sex couples have gotten married in the six states that allow it: New York, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Massachusetts and Iowa, plus the District of Columbia. Other states give same-sex couples the benefits of marriage without the name, but many couples won’t be satisfied until they can get married.
“Right now it’s basically a second-class citizenship,” said Washington state Rep. Laurie Jinkins, a Democrat and one of six openly gay members in the Washington legislature who are crafting a strategy for the passage of a marriage law, possibly as early as next spring. Washington state’s voters approved a domestic partnership law in 2009.
Federal and state marriage laws pose special challenges for same-sex couples with children. According to the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, 115,000 such couples are raising children.
In Lexington, Ky., Jessica Bollinger and her partner of 17 years, Cathy Wieschhoff, have an 11-year-old adopted son, Lucas. Bollinger, who is the adoptive parent, said that if they lived in a state that recognized same-sex marriage, there would be more security for her son.
Bollinger said she and her partner have indicated in their will and spoken with family members to assure that if she died, her partner could take custody of their son and be the legal parent.
But the law wouldn’t automatically grant Wieschhoff custody, something that married opposite-sex couples would take for granted.
“She is as much his parent as I am,” Bollinger said.
For other couples, the lack of marriage rights reinforces long-standing social stigmas against gay people.
Beverly Fletcher of Fort Worth, Texas, who married her partner of 20 years in Connecticut, said her family has struggled at times against barriers and “institutional challenges” in a state that doesn’t recognize their marriage.
When her now 12-year-old daughter was in elementary school, another mother protested to the school that Fletcher should not be allowed to accompany the children on field trips, Fletcher said. The mother wanted her banned from the classroom, though the school supported Fletcher.
“We have spent our entire adult lives together, my wife and I,” Fletcher said. “It is so discouraging to be married and to not be honored as being married here in my own community. When we go other places and visit other communities, they really are so surprised at what we still deal with here.”
But others said it mattered less how the government defined their families.
Paul Wolford and Howard Freedland, both 48, of Davis, Calif., were married in June 2008 during the brief window before Proposition 8 when gay couples in California could legally do so.
Wolford, a preschool teacher, and Freedland, an attorney, are parents to an 8-year-old daughter and a 6-year-old son.
Wolford believes Americans are generally more accepting of gay couples — and harbor fewer stereotypes about them. While Wolford isn’t happy that his marriage wouldn’t have been permitted after Proposition 8 passed a few months later, he’s decided not to vociferously campaign to repeal the measure.
“My greatest activism is just living a normal life,” he said.

Friday, October 7, 2011

No Angels Na Madruga!!!







Gente,todos sabem muito bem que amo as No Angels.
Amos essas safadinhas da Alemanha que somem por um tempinho,mas quando voltam,voltam com tudo,cheias de surpresas.
Pois bem...Agora são 3:27 da manhã aqui no Rio e eu não consigo dormir (Mesmo me entupindo de rivotril gotas,rsrsrsrsrsrsrs).
Agora mesmo eu estava vendo o clipe delas na música "One Life"(O Último que elas fizeram,até agora),e sem frescuras,o clipe é Baphooooooo!!!!
 Assista embaixo as Não anjinhas fazendo um live babado da song:


Wednesday, October 5, 2011

New Federal Rule Underscores Importance of DOMA Repeal!!!


On Friday,  The Office Of Personnel Management (OMP)Published a final rule in the federal register to provide eligible federal employees up to 12 workweeks of unpaid leave for "qualifying exigency purposes." Just what are qualifying exigencies, you ask yourself? Well, under the rule, qualifying exigencies arise when the spouse, son, daughter or parent of an employee is on active duty in the Armed Forces, or has been notified of an impending call or order to active duty status.
Sounds simple enough, right? Providing the protections of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) to federal employees whose spouse, son, daughter or parent is serving in the Armed Forces on active duty in a foreign country (or is about to) just makes sense as the right, common sense thing to do. As OPM states in its summary of the rule, it is intended to help eligible federal employees manage family affairs when their family members are serving on active duty.
 Extending these protections to lesbian, gay and bisexual service members whose spouses are federal employees likewise seems like the fair, common sense thing to do. However, DADT's demise left one remaining federal law that mandates federal discrimination against people based on their sexual orientation . And it is because of DOMA that those federal employees who have a spouse serving on active duty in a foreign country will not be included in the protections of this new federal rule.
If this strikes you as both senseless and heartless, I can simply say that it is yet another perfect illustration of the real-world harms DOMA has done to tens of thousands of married same-sex couples and their children and families, while doing absolutely nothing to defend anyone's marriage.
When you dig deeper into the rule, the needless cruelty done to same-sex couples, where one member is serving in the U.S. Armed Forces on active duty no less, becomes even more striking.One of the qualifying exigencies is to, "attend family support or assistance programs and informational briefings sponsored or promoted by the military, military service organizations, or the American Red Cross that are related to the covered active duty or call to covered active duty status of a covered military member." Do same-sex couples in these situations deserve less family support? According to DOMA, the answer is yes. In fact, DOMA considers these married couples legal strangers under federal law.
It is a strange and sad irony that DADT's Demise has allowed lesbian, gay and bisexual service members to serve their country openly and honestly; and yet the married same-sex spouses of these service members who are federal employees can be denied something as basic as the ability to use FMLA time to take part in family support services.
Enough is enough. DOMA needs to join DADT in history's trash bin. DOMA's continued existence does daily harm to tens of thousands of American families. Congress should act to repeal DOMA — the last remaining federal law that expressly discriminates against a group of Americans based purely on their sexual orientation. 

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

The Saturdays New Cd's Cover "On Your Radar"!!!

The Saturdays Fourth Album is set to be released on November 21st this year!!!

Lollipop Reunion... For Just one Night!!!

As Lollipop se Reuniram por uma noite em um programa na Itália depois de 10 anos da formação da banda no programa "Popstars".


Infelizmente,a banda se reuniu em quarteto,já que Dominique Fidanza não se juntou ás 4 antigas amigas de trabalho na noite do dia 30 de setembro deste ano.

Sunday, August 28, 2011

My CD Collection...Newest Ones (5)

  Colbie Caillat- All Of You (USA/2011)
 Britney Spears- Femme Fatale (Deluxe Edition) (USA/2011)

Thursday, August 25, 2011

My CD Collection...Newest Ones (4)

Excellence-The Region Of Excellence (Sweden/2001)
Bardot-Play It Like That (Australia/2001)
Lady Gaga- Born This Way (USA/2011)
Lady Gaga- Born This Way (Special Edition) (USA/2011)
Christina Aguilera- Stripped (Taiwan) (USA/2002)
Queensberry- Volume I (Germany/2008)
Danity Kane- Welcome To The Dollhouse (USA/2008)
Lindsay Lohan- Speak (USA/2004)
Xuxa 2 (Argentina/1991)
Xuxa 3 (Argentina/1992)
Xuxa- El Pequeño Mundo (Argentina/1994)
No Angels- Now... Us! (Special Winter Edition) (Germany/2002)
No Angels- Acoustic Angels (Germany/2004)
Sandy Mölling- Unexpected (Germany/2004)
Lucy Diakovska- The Other Side (Germany/2005)
Escarcha- Escarcha (Colombia/2002)
NonStop- NonStop (Portugal/2001)
Fergie- The Dutchess (USA/2006)
Monrose- Temptation (Germany/2006)
The Saturdays- Headlines! (UK/2010)
Adele- 21 (England/2011)
My Baby brought me those Cds on August 11 2011 when he Came here in Rio!!!
Can't Believe I got NonStop's First CD!!!!! :)

Friday, July 15, 2011

"Never Forget": Veja as primeiras imagens do clipe solo de Lena Katina, ex-integrante do t.A.T.u


Com o fim oficial da dupla russa de falsas lésbicas t.A.T.u, ao final do mês de março deste ano, Lena Katina começou a se dedicar apenas à sua carreira solo.
Espera-se que a cantora lance o seu primeiro álbum solo ainda este ano ou no início de 2012, sob a gravadora criada juntamente com sua parceira de banda, a T.A. Music.
O primeiro single oficial da carreira solo de Lena, intitulado "Never Forget", teve sua estreia em uma rádio mexicana no último dia 17 de junho. O clipe da faixa já foi gravado e, utilizando seu site oficial, Lena divulgou algumas fotos das gravações do vídeo. Veja:








Ouça o single abaixo:

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...